Why I’m Pro-Drones But Anti-Obama (On Drones)

 

At TEDxCharlotte 2011, Dr. Mark Moore from NASA gave a fascinating talk on the future of personal air travel. In his message, he also addressed the positive potential for unmanned (“autonomous”) vehicles such as self-driving cars and drones:

This is by far one of my favorite TEDxCharlotte talks. The notion that personal travel (with cars and airplanes) has not evolved much in the last 100 years, and that new technology could be just on the horizon to open new vistas of opportunity (amidst radical and social change) was (and is) pretty exhilarating.

But as I’ve told some people about this TEDx talk, usually the first reaction I get — especially when I described “hummingbird” drones that could follow kids as they walk to school in the morning — has been mostly gasps of horror and, well, fear. People naturally fear invasion of privacy, and the potential good of these new devices seems to be outweighed by the negative aspects. There is already a building hysteria about government use of drones inside U.S. borders.

By now, we should all be well aware of the military use of drone devices and the havoc they are capable of wreaking overseas (despite attempts to hide and cover it up). Ian Ebright is producing a film to illustrate a story of how lives can be torn apart by drone warfare.

As a follower of Jesus, I am deeply troubled by the moral disconnect between military controllers in a bunker somewhere in Nevada pushing a button that leads to the death of men, women, and children in a foreign country thousands of miles away. Or the disconnect between the President in the White House or senior administration officials giving the order, which is even one step further removed from the bloodshed.

I’m all for technological progress, and I’m personally thrilled for the new possibilities of personal air travel and some of the possible domestic uses for drones. But I am 100% opposed to the Obama administration’s use of drone warfare for military purposes overseas and here at home. Using drones as eyes to see what is going on in remote places, where it’s unsafe to send in military or police personnel is one thing, but weaponizing and using drones as hands to kill is completely another.

My friends who have criticized me over my support for President Obama (in both elections) have also challenged me to speak up on issues I disagree with this administration about. I have done that — on issues of economic reform, comprehensive immigration reform, etc. — and I will continue to do that, especially over this issue of drone warfare. I’ll be supporting efforts by groups like the Fellowship of Reconciliation as they seek to lobby the government on this issue, and I hope that you’ll join me.

UPDATE 3/3/2013: Speaking at TEDxHelvetia, Andreas Raptopoulos introduced Matternet, a project designed to use small, flying autonomous robots to deliver medicine to places inaccessible by typical modes of transportation. “We believe that Matternet can do for the transportation of matter what the Internet did for the flow of information.” What do you think of this application?

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted on 03-02-2013

Comments

  1. I’m Proud to Be a Member of the Church of TED | knightopia.com | the online home of Steve Knight says:

    March 2nd, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    […] out my favorite TEDxCharlotte talk from […]

  2. Larry Kamphausen (priestlygoth) says:

    March 2nd, 2013 at 2:24 pm

    The thing is that your example of an apporpriate or inocuous use of drones, as the eyes for police in dangerous situations is bound up in what you find unacceptable. Both allow for the distancing of the risk of a particular action from the human agents involved in the action.
    This seems to me to be the problem with drones, it is the ways in which technology tends to distance us from the consequences of our actions.
    Now the good of the technology may out weigh the negative of this distancing at times, but in the case of drones my intuition says this technology even in terms of transportation exponentially distances us from our actions in a way that could possibly hide from us the consequences of that action. If I no longer have to think about how I get from point A to point B, have I distanced myself from my limits as a body.
    As someone who doesn’t currently own a car or drive a car on on a regular basis I would say that my sense of my body and of human community has increased by choosing not to drive. The cost of the convenience of the car are taken from my body and from my relation to other human beings. When I drive I’m now keenly aware of my isolation and the negative impact of driving upon the body. We often don’t think about the costs of technological progress. Great mobility does have costs many are negative it’s hard to calculate if the costs actually out weigh the benefits. But then I fly and do still drive at times. So, I guess I’m more arguing for actively choosing to limit ourselves.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment via Facebook